The end of the Ad World’s airbrush enhanced reality!

February 25th, 2010 by jlightstone

Well,  maybe the world is coming to some ‘real world’ reality that air brushing in ads has been destroying the world’s self image.

Recently a few politicians in France and Britain have been pushing around a plan to make advertisers label ads with a warning message stating that the pictures have been retouched.  This plan actually agrees with me!  Now as a visual person, an advertiser, and a painter, I am certainly the first one to love and study great design and the beauties of a nude women.  Certainly the ad and  art world have stylized the human form for many years, and we do need hyper reality sometimes. However media is now everywhere, and is being shown to young people constantly. Once upon a time, people would see these stylized pictures only sometimes (like in the Louvre) and there was limits on the technology.  As a person and a parent, I am concerned for what these images are doing to people. I won’t go over the effects and causes, this debate is large and for another time.  I am going to offer another limit and solution to airbrushing in ads. I think that ads, especially the fashion type ads, should state the age of the model (something like ‘Sarah, age 17′)!

Again I love beautiful women, but the ‘women’ that these superficial design people are portraying in ads are seldom women…..they are young girls (who are often anorexic)! I would go further and say that most of these girls look like young teen boys.  Now I won’t tell you why ‘i think’ these design people use these boyish girls, as I am seldom politically correct in a debate.  One only needs to look at the ‘environment’ of the design people to understand their design influences.

Now you might ask why I think the age of the model should be stated along with usage of airbrushing.  Well it again comes back to everyone’s attraction to beautiful people.  There is nothing wrong with adults (men or women) thinking a young person is beautiful, however, seeing the age would quantify and restrict the admiration.  Turning it from jealousy and lust, to a mere appreciation and applause.  For older women seeing these ads, they would begin to understand the impossibillity of trying to have the body of a teenager. For young teenage girls they would realize that these girls are likely younger than them, and that it is not some 25-35 year old women as portrayed uber-chic and succesful. Ultimately, these girls can grow up and age sensibly without unrealistic expectation on their body.  Now for men, adding the age would also have an effect.  Most men, especially young men, are known to be infatuated with girls and victims to their hormones.  However, any sane man would quickly place their hormone in check if they knew the ‘25 year old looking’ girl in the ad was actually younger than their little sister and might be legally known as ‘jail bait’.  Young men would quickly realize the nature of girls vs women in reality, and would quickly appreciate the ‘real’ full figured women.  As they say in the ad business ‘Sex sells’.  Once men began to truly appreciate the ‘real’ women, then true women could live a normal life without always second guessing their weight and trying to reach airbrushed goals. Now a world without superficial airbrushing would certainly achieve world peace, but Obama (or previously Bush) would need to find a bail out plan for the diet business  (maybe too for ad people making diet and fitness equipment infomercials)!

Here is some more  info on the French and British plans.
France May Put Warning Labels on Airbrushed Photos

Ban airbrushing of models in children’s ads, says MP


Are Beck, Limbaugh and Murdoch/FOX corp just a bunch of fake conservatives or closet Obama supporters?

February 9th, 2010 by jlightstone

You might not be aware , but I sometimes have conservative views, mixed in with fairly liberal and libertarian views, so often I listen to various talk radio shows because I like listening to the issues and the mix of idiots that call in.  I usually get a good chuckle at how the hosts cut people off and hang up on them when the callers makes a good point or disagrees with the host.

So when I arrived in Florida for a little holiday, I looked for a radio channel broadcasting the late night show CoasttoCoastAM (pls don’t laugh, I don’t care for the alien or bigfoot  topics) I sometimes listen to.  It so happens that  the station is a FOX/Murdoch radio station, and during the day time they start to broadcast the conservative Glen Beck and the drug addict hypocrit Rush Limbaugh. For those not aware, Rupert Murch was a big George Bush and Republican supporter. Now as I started to listen to Beck and Limbaugh and their anti-government talk I realized that many of the ads on the station where actually government paid ads and PSAs.  Now, I don’t totally discredit Beck, he might be a sensationalist but he does make some good points. However, if you are a conservative who believes in less government how can you possibly justify ‘paying the radio station bills’ using government sponsored ads!  This just seems like ‘Evil Big Government’ enterting our homes via the airwaves.  If Murdoch and his hosts were running such great private enterprises, and be so anti ‘government hand-outs’, they should be able to pay the bills without government ads.

The ads on the conservative Murdoch station should only or mostly be private businesses who make up the free market.  If government’s hand is involved in radio ads, then this will distort the market and increase prices for the average business owner looking to advertise.

Ultimately all the fat cat radio execs are going to get fat bonuses paid for by average ‘patriots’.

Ok FOX, Murdoch, Limbaugh, and Beck, I agree that too much government can lead to excess and waste.  But sometimes when business is tough and the country is about to fall off a cliff the hand of government might be necessary (ie. keysian economics).  Obviously your radio station is not affraid to suck off the goverment tit and dole.  So your business must be hurting and you need government help, thus shame on you for being so weak, and a poorly run business (therefore the market should bankrupt you).  Or your business is doing fine and a well run capatalist enterprise; thus Murdoch for taking government money you are just a greedy business, willing to go against your values whenever you know that easy gov’t money can be put in your bank account.

Come on Beck, Murdoch, Limbaugh and team, just admit you like government handouts when it helps make you rich.  So who is the greedy bankers now, and wasteful government now?


[ ArtsandTV.company Inc. // 636 Broadway, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10012 // 646.315.1663 ]