|
|
|
|
|
February 25th, 2010 by jlightstone
Well, maybe the world is coming to some ‘real world’ reality that air brushing in ads has been destroying the world’s self image.
Recently a few politicians in France and Britain have been pushing around a plan to make advertisers label ads with a warning message stating that the pictures have been retouched. This plan actually agrees with me! Now as a visual person, an advertiser, and a painter, I am certainly the first one to love and study great design and the beauties of a nude women. Certainly the ad and art world have stylized the human form for many years, and we do need hyper reality sometimes. However media is now everywhere, and is being shown to young people constantly. Once upon a time, people would see these stylized pictures only sometimes (like in the Louvre) and there was limits on the technology. As a person and a parent, I am concerned for what these images are doing to people. I won’t go over the effects and causes, this debate is large and for another time. I am going to offer another limit and solution to airbrushing in ads. I think that ads, especially the fashion type ads, should state the age of the model (something like ‘Sarah, age 17′)!
Again I love beautiful women, but the ‘women’ that these superficial design people are portraying in ads are seldom women…..they are young girls (who are often anorexic)! I would go further and say that most of these girls look like young teen boys. Now I won’t tell you why ‘i think’ these design people use these boyish girls, as I am seldom politically correct in a debate. One only needs to look at the ‘environment’ of the design people to understand their design influences.
Now you might ask why I think the age of the model should be stated along with usage of airbrushing. Well it again comes back to everyone’s attraction to beautiful people. There is nothing wrong with adults (men or women) thinking a young person is beautiful, however, seeing the age would quantify and restrict the admiration. Turning it from jealousy and lust, to a mere appreciation and applause. For older women seeing these ads, they would begin to understand the impossibillity of trying to have the body of a teenager. For young teenage girls they would realize that these girls are likely younger than them, and that it is not some 25-35 year old women as portrayed uber-chic and succesful. Ultimately, these girls can grow up and age sensibly without unrealistic expectation on their body. Now for men, adding the age would also have an effect. Most men, especially young men, are known to be infatuated with girls and victims to their hormones. However, any sane man would quickly place their hormone in check if they knew the ‘25 year old looking’ girl in the ad was actually younger than their little sister and might be legally known as ‘jail bait’. Young men would quickly realize the nature of girls vs women in reality, and would quickly appreciate the ‘real’ full figured women. As they say in the ad business ‘Sex sells’. Once men began to truly appreciate the ‘real’ women, then true women could live a normal life without always second guessing their weight and trying to reach airbrushed goals. Now a world without superficial airbrushing would certainly achieve world peace, but Obama (or previously Bush) would need to find a bail out plan for the diet business (maybe too for ad people making diet and fitness equipment infomercials)!
Here is some more info on the French and British plans.
France May Put Warning Labels on Airbrushed Photos
Ban airbrushing of models in children’s ads, says MP
Tags: print
Posted in Online Advertising, Outdoor, Print, Television | No Comments »
February 9th, 2010 by jlightstone
You might not be aware , but I sometimes have conservative views, mixed in with fairly liberal and libertarian views, so often I listen to various talk radio shows because I like listening to the issues and the mix of idiots that call in. I usually get a good chuckle at how the hosts cut people off and hang up on them when the callers makes a good point or disagrees with the host.
So when I arrived in Florida for a little holiday, I looked for a radio channel broadcasting the late night show CoasttoCoastAM (pls don’t laugh, I don’t care for the alien or bigfoot topics) I sometimes listen to. It so happens that the station is a FOX/Murdoch radio station, and during the day time they start to broadcast the conservative Glen Beck and the drug addict hypocrit Rush Limbaugh. For those not aware, Rupert Murch was a big George Bush and Republican supporter. Now as I started to listen to Beck and Limbaugh and their anti-government talk I realized that many of the ads on the station where actually government paid ads and PSAs. Now, I don’t totally discredit Beck, he might be a sensationalist but he does make some good points. However, if you are a conservative who believes in less government how can you possibly justify ‘paying the radio station bills’ using government sponsored ads! This just seems like ‘Evil Big Government’ enterting our homes via the airwaves. If Murdoch and his hosts were running such great private enterprises, and be so anti ‘government hand-outs’, they should be able to pay the bills without government ads.
The ads on the conservative Murdoch station should only or mostly be private businesses who make up the free market. If government’s hand is involved in radio ads, then this will distort the market and increase prices for the average business owner looking to advertise.
Ultimately all the fat cat radio execs are going to get fat bonuses paid for by average ‘patriots’.
Ok FOX, Murdoch, Limbaugh, and Beck, I agree that too much government can lead to excess and waste. But sometimes when business is tough and the country is about to fall off a cliff the hand of government might be necessary (ie. keysian economics). Obviously your radio station is not affraid to suck off the goverment tit and dole. So your business must be hurting and you need government help, thus shame on you for being so weak, and a poorly run business (therefore the market should bankrupt you). Or your business is doing fine and a well run capatalist enterprise; thus Murdoch for taking government money you are just a greedy business, willing to go against your values whenever you know that easy gov’t money can be put in your bank account.
Come on Beck, Murdoch, Limbaugh and team, just admit you like government handouts when it helps make you rich. So who is the greedy bankers now, and wasteful government now?
Posted in Just For Fun, Radio, Traditional Media | No Comments »
August 25th, 2009 by jlightstone
We have been working on some IASH related projects and have found many instances where media suppliers were not delivering ads on the web sites they had offered in their plan. Sometimes the sites which the ads were delivered on where totally in violation of local morality laws or simply inappropriate for the intended audience of the ad. It even seems like 247 Realmedia a massive network has had issue with IASH and ads they showed on onlyfights.com.
IASH standards in the UK and a similar IAB version to be soon released in the USA, set standards of the type of content that media sellers can place ads upon. These standard specify the obvious like pornography, hate speech, pirated content and similar, but also restricts on moderated versus unmoderated forums, or brokers who sub-broker their contracts without notifying the client.
ArtsandTV then implemented tools in our ad server to stop this and monitor our suppliers in real time. We then found very interesting issues that this was a problem not only for smaller media companies, but even on large publishers.
We will be writing more about IASH soon, and will have some interesting announcement soon to follow.
For the purpose of this blog, we wanted to include an article from mad.co.uk and British business web site. Since the mad.co.uk article requires a login. We are posting the link to google cached version of the full article ( Google Cache / IASH boots 247 Realmedia ) and in case a picture of the article.
 247realmedia-booted-from-iash
.
For easiest access we have also copied the full article text from Mad.co.uk, this article was originally sourced from nma.co.uk.
———————————————————————————–
WPP-owned 24/7 Real Media has become the first ad network to be suspended from *IASH* as it clamps down on ad misplacement.
The network has been thrown out of the trade body, which polices 27 ad networks, for failing to take part in July’s audit.
The expulsion follows an IASH investigation into the ad misplacement issue raised by NMA, which found ads for top brands like Orange and Virgin Media being served on explicit site Onlyfights.com .
This is the first time an ad network has been suspended from IASH and shows it’s determined to address the industry’s patchy reputation.
The decision was taken at an IASH committee meeting on 9 July, when 18 of 19 ad networks voted in favour of the action. It leaves 24/7 Real Media unable to rejoin IASH unless it passes the next ABCE audit in September.
IASH chairman James Aitken condemned the network. “24/7 Real Media breached our code of conduct, which we take very seriously.
” It was one of three ad networks that failed to gain full membership of the trade body in 2007 but passed an audit last March.
A 24/7 Real Media spokeswoman said, “We remain committed to the principles and practices of IASH.”
IASH has implemented a new system to ensure networks obtain a list of URLs wh
en purchasing inventory from other networks in a bid to increase transparency.
Posted in IASH Content Rating UK, Online Advertising | No Comments »
April 22nd, 2009 by James Wallace
A story over at TechCrunch this morning alerted me to a group known as the Fair Syndication Consortium. The idea behind this group is to try and provide fair compensation to content authors whose material is being used (often without permission) on websites earning revenue from advertisements.
The first hurdle I see with the lofty goals of this group is identifying the recycled content.
Surprise, surprise, Attributor, the company responsible for the creation of this consortium already has products available to help with identifying and locating your content on third party websites. How convenient for them!
The second problem I see with the plans of the consortium is attracting players from both sides, advertisers and publishers. As a website owner, they are hoping to appeal to your sense of fairness.
By joining the consortium, you are standing up for a vibrant and fair content economy.
Listen, if I’m ripping off someones content to populate my own sites, the last thing I care about is a fair content economy! So I guess this is why the consortium is trying to get publishers involved.
With the assistance of Google or Yahoo, this consortium could potentially go after your ad earnings without you even knowing. That may scare some of these thieves straight, but more likely they’ll just switch to a non participating network for their ads.
Finally, this consortium almost seems to be encouraging more scam bloggers and content recyclers. If I know the content owner will be automatically receiving a cut of my ad revenue, I may not be so hesitant to launch more of these sites. I’m sure others share my feelings on this one.
The more I think about it, this whole thing reeks off RIAA’s infamous bully tactics. Threaten anyone and everyone, let the courts sort it out. Don’t get me wrong! I’m all for condemning the thieves of the internet who try to make ad revenue off of someone else’s content.
What worries me here is the emergence of an online content police force.
Tags: attributor, compensation for content authors, fair syndication consortium, identify stolen content on the web, online content police
Posted in Online Advertising | No Comments »
April 4th, 2009 by James Wallace
A post earlier this week on the Yahoo Publisher Network blog got me thinking about newspapers.
Almost daily, large traditional print publishers are moving resources to their online operations. ..
Yahoo! is helping newspapers make this transition through our APT product serving the Newspaper Consortium…
The idea that Yahoo! is targetting newspaper companies as a revenue stream is what interests me here. With articles around the web crying the death of the printed news, the time is perfect to be targetting these companies and it’s silly it took news of Yahoo! doing it to spur me on.
Large national paper sites like thestar.com are some of the most frequently visited sites on the net, and have extremely low Alexa rankings. Combine this with a nice geotargeted selling strategy and it sounds like a win to me, and that is exactly how Yahoo! is playing it.
On a smaller level, you’ve got the countless smaller local papers who haven’t been bought up by a large corporation yet. While the number of these operations dwindles, they still represent a significant chunk of paper readership. Has Yahoo! targetted these guys yet?
The Point
I guess my point here is it doesn’t hurt to copy off the big guys once in awhile. Yahoo! going after newspaper people? Why don’t we try that too, and leverage these big news Yahoo deals to try and spur on the sale? Can’t hurt!
The news also leads me to believe there will be a lot more targetted newspaper inventory up for grabs in the near future. Always an easy sell to advertisers.
Newspapers are definitely a vertical to be watching in the coming months!
Tags: advertising on newspaper sites, newspaper consortium and yahoo, newspaper vertical, targetted advertising, thestar.com
Posted in Online Advertising | No Comments »
March 29th, 2009 by James Wallace
Sometime in 2008, Google launched a new Adsense feature called Video Units. The video units allowed publishers to embed video players of different sizes into their sites, to try and earn revenue from clicks on the video ads.
Today Google has announced that the feature is not performing as well as they had hoped, and they will be retiring it by the end of April.
This move doesn’t come as much of a surprise. The videos in most categories were fairly poor, and I doubt became much of a draw on anyones site.
As well, it was impossible to mix the Google video units with your own streaming video content; you had to embed a dedicated player for them. Had the Google team worked on out this shortcoming, the adoption rates for the service would surely have been much better.
Tags: death to google video units, google video units end of life, video advertising discontinued
Posted in Online Advertising | No Comments »
March 26th, 2009 by James Wallace
One of the reasons I love following the Google teams so much is that they never take themselves too seriously. Between all the great tech tidbits, announcements about product upgrades, and helpful tutorials, you find gems like this.

Find out how this cake was made here!
Tags: analytics dashboard, google analytics cake, google cake
Posted in Just For Fun | No Comments »
March 25th, 2009 by James Wallace
Sometime in the last few weeks, the Google Adsense team announced a new feature they would be rolling out called Interest based ads. What is this all about?
Google Adsense has tens of thousands of websites showing their advertisements, maybe more. As a result, Google is in a position to be able to accurately identify a specific users interests. I’m surprised they haven’t rolled something like this out before now!
How it will Work
Essentially, every publisher participating in the Adsense program will have their sites categorized. Then, through a cookie, or maybe an IP, Google will track users and determine which category of site they visit the most.
Traditionally the ads shown on a publishers site are targetted to the page content. After April 8th (the rollout date for this feature), surfers to your site could be seeing ads based on their interests.
The interest targeted ads won’t be replacing the traditional system, but will instead work in conjunction with it. The Adsense system will attempt to choose an ad best fit to the surfer, that will make you the most money.
What does this mean for the typical Adsense publisher?
Increased revenues, at least, in theory. Show users advertisements about things they are interested in, and they will be more likely to click. More clicks, more money.
In reality, I don’t think this change will do much for the average publisher. People aren’t going to suddenly start clicking ads just because it’s about something they like. The few clicks you do receive may earn you a bit more money, which is great, but don’t expect your earnings to double or triple overnight.
Reactions?
The reception to the news of this program has sparked some hot debate, as the anti big brother, tinfoil hat crowd reacts. Check out this post over at Adbusters to see what I mean. Google is monitoring our lives! Collecting our data and tracking our movements! Give me a break. Compared to the tactics traditional advertisers have been using for years, this latest Google move is nothing to break a sweat over. As a publisher, you have the option of opting your sites out of this new program too.
Personally, I’m keeping an open mind about the program until I see results. What are your thoughts?
Tags: adbusters against google interest ads, contextual advertising, enable interest based ads adsense, google adbusters backlash, google interest based ads
Posted in Online Advertising | No Comments »
March 23rd, 2009 by James Wallace
With so much happening in the coming weeks in the world of online advertising, this seems like a perfect time to be launching our company blog!
This week marks the start of SES New York, and while more of a search related event than advertising, the two worlds are more closely related than ever. Google has teased us about a new Adwords design, and some exciting talks… one in particular about ‘Pay Per Conversation’. The idea that every click is a user trying to start a conversation with you, is rather interesting. Hopefully we get some slides online in the coming days.
Not to be left out in the cold, Yahoo will also be in attendance, helping organize the SearchAppalooza event. A search focused developer challenge, sure to breath some new life into the arena.
Once SES wraps up, we’ve got ad:tech happening in April. Alongside ad:tech this year is a new contextual advertising focused event called ADSPACE. With both going on at once, it’ll be a really hard to event to stay away from!
Anyway, welcome to the blog. Hope to see you back soon!
Tags: ad:tech april, adspace conference san fran, arts and tv blog launch, new adsense design, searchappalooza, ses new york
Posted in Online Advertising | No Comments »
|
|
|
|
[ ArtsandTV.company Inc. // 636 Broadway, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10012 // 646.315.1663 ]
|
|
|
|
|